Evidence Synthesis Guide : Evidence Synthesis Decision Tree

This guide provides information and resources which may be helpful when undertaking a systematic review, scoping review or other type of evidence synthesis review.

Review Typology Decision Tree

The decision tree presented below is based on the Review Methodology Decision Tree developed by Cornell University Library. Use the decision tree to determine which type of evidence synthesis review works best for you depending on your team, time, research question, and resources.  See Right Review for additional types of quantitative and qualitative reviews.

Common Types of Evidence Synthesis

Common types of evidence synthesis include: 
 

​​Systematic Review

  • Systematically and transparently collect and categorize existing evidence on a broad question of scientific, policy or management importance.
  • Compares, evaluates, and synthesizes evidence in a search for the effect of an intervention. 
  • Time-intensive and often take months to a year or more to complete. 
  • The most commonly referred to type of evidence synthesis. Sometimes confused as a blanket term for other types of reviews.
     

​​Literature (Narrative) Review

  • A broad term referring to reviews with a wide scope and non-standardized methodology. 
  • Search strategies, comprehensiveness, and time range covered will vary and do not follow an established protocol.
     

​Scoping Review or Evidence Map

  • Systematically and transparently collect and categorize existing evidence on a broad question of scientific, policy or management importance.
  • Seeks to identify research gaps and opportunities for evidence synthesis rather than searching for the effect of an intervention. 
  • May critically evaluate existing evidence, but does not attempt to synthesize the results in the way a systematic review would. 
  • May take longer than a systematic review.
     

​Rapid Review

  • Applies Systematic Review methodology within a time-constrained setting.
  • Employs methodological "shortcuts" (limiting search terms for example) at the risk of introducing bias.
  • Useful for addressing issues needing quick decisions, such as developing policy recommendations.

  •  

Umbrella Review

  • Reviews other systematic reviews on a topic. 
  • Often defines a broader question than is typical of a traditional systematic review.
  • Most useful when there are competing interventions to consider.
     

Meta-analysis

  • Statistical technique for combining the findings from disparate quantitative studies.
  • Uses statistical methods to objectively evaluate, synthesize, and summarize results.
  • May be conducted independently or as part of a systematic review.